[Bug target/94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on aarch64

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383

--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #14)
>     [AArch64] (PR94383) Avoid C++17 empty base field checking for HVA/HFA
>     
>     In C++17, an empty class deriving from an empty base is not an
>     aggregate, while in C++14 it is.

FWIW that's backwards.