https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94694
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > I've missed that. I'm afraid there is no way around missing sinl/cosl/tanl > etc., > those aren't likely implemented inline by the compiler. The only exception > would be for targets where long double and double are the same type. > What has libgfortran been doing before? Seems to me it just wouldn't define > the _gfortran* entrypoint that use them. But if long double is 64-bit, there is no really a point to use the *l suffixed functions, is it?
