https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |law at redhat dot com
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=81601
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
So the core issue here, using an if, conditional moves and the like to do
single bit field extraction/testing is resolved.
There is still an issue of canonicalizing the two representations which in turn
opens up the possibility of finding more common subexpressions when both forms
might be used. That is actually being tracked via pr81601.
