https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
--- Comment #7 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #4) > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #3) > > (In reply to Wilco from comment #2) > > > This was introduced by commit e24f6408d so only in GCC10. > > > > Thank you for checking this! > > > > I am quite sure this fails in gcc-9 as well: > ... > > Perhaps the offending commit, or part of it, was backported to gcc-9 as > > well? > > It's possible it was recently backported and our GCC9 builds don't yet have > it. But that whole patch is badly broken and introduces multiple issues... Adding Christophe. I'm thinking the best approach right now is to revert given -mpure-code doesn't work at all on Thumb-1 targets - it still emits literal pools, switch tables etc. That's not pure code!
