https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82113
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34516#c1
"This is a defect in the standard wording. Copy elision cannot be guaranteed
when initializing a base class subobject, because base classes can have
different layout than the corresponding complete object type."
