https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #24) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22) > > > Created attachment 48063 [details] > > > more localized caching > > > > > > Like this. Martin, can you also check the effect on this one? > > > > We can actually simplify since we won't ever use non-NULL cached vals which > > also means this patch is a no-op and should be worse than the existing > > state :/ > > So no testing is needed? would be still interesting (but surprising) if it helps (doesn't matter whether the original or the updated patch, the update is just constant time improvement)
