https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note that C++ FE is correct: $ g++ pr94029.c --coverage -c void test_t2()=3:3(location_t:2147483629)-3:3(location_t:2147483634) void test_t1()=2:1(location_t:2147483638)-2:1(location_t:2147483643) while C does: $ gcc pr94029.c --coverage -c test_t2=3:3(location_t:2147483629)-2:1(location_t:246216) test_t1=2:1(location_t:2147483638)-2:1(location_t:246216)