https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> In r10-7086-g2e94d3ee47be0742df843d95e3d1bf1da11e4796 I've added a param
> controlled cap on the number of VALUEs walked by a single toplevel
> find_base_term.
> Does it make a difference on this?

The current master still fails with a timeout of 5 minutes. Perf looks a bit
lower for find_base_term:

    46.64%  f951      f951              [.] find_base_term
     8.91%  f951      f951              [.] ix86_find_base_term
     2.19%  f951      libc-2.31.so      [.] _int_malloc
     2.15%  f951      f951              [.] get_ref_base_and_extent
     2.11%  f951      f951              [.] bitmap_set_bit
     2.03%  f951      f951              [.] find_base_term
     1.75%  f951      f951              [.] cselib_sp_based_value_p
     1.52%  f951      f951              [.] pre_expr_reaches_here_p_work
     1.51%  f951      f951              [.] fsm_find_thread_path
     1.20%  f951      f951              [.] build_object_conflicts

Reply via email to