https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The new test FAILs on (at least) Solaris with the native assembler (and
probably
others like Darwin and HP-UX):
+FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o assemble, -O0 -fipa-vrp -flto
-Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o-c_lto_pr94157_0.o execute
-O0 -fipa-vrp -flto -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o-c_lto_pr94157_0.o link -O0
-fipa-vrp -flto -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'e'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'xecstack'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'e'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'xecstack'^M
[...]
Either use something portable here or restrict the test to assemblers supporing
--execstack/--noexecstack.
