https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94044
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> So perhaps to ease reproduction, tweak the hash function in this case to
> always return 0?
Yes, that works. I just didn't have a chance to look at the hash function last
night. With the hash function hacked I can reproduce for any target and any
-std=c++X value.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 789ccdb..4337928 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -1733,7 +1733,8 @@ hash_tmpl_and_args (tree tmpl, tree args)
hashval_t
spec_hasher::hash (spec_entry *e)
{
- return hash_tmpl_and_args (e->tmpl, e->args);
+ return 0;
+ // return hash_tmpl_and_args (e->tmpl, e->args);
}
/* Recursively calculate a hash value for a template argument ARG, for use
