https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93964
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2020-03-02 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. 1104 gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (name) == SSA_NAME 1105 && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name)) 1106 && ! defined_in_sese_p (name, region->region)); the parameter has pointer type. Some disconnect between analyses predicates. Ouch. It's from niters which niter analysis expanded that far. (unsigned int) (long int) _1 + 4294967295 So we end up using _1 instead of _2 here which would have been fine :/