https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Yea, we end up with ~260k stores in the key block.
The rate limiters in tree/gimple DSE are the number of queries we make per
store and the size of object for which we'll do byte tracking.
Clearly with hundreds of thousands of stores we may want another limiter --
obviously a user could write code that triggers this problem directly. I'll
figure out a reasonable limiter for DSE.
It also seems like SRA went a little bananas here and that's probably more
important to fix since it's taking fairly sensible code and exploding it beyone
sensibility.
