[Bug c++/88380] [8 Regression] Sequence of not-explicitly initialised, initialised, variable length generates no initialiser

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88380

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9bfe25d3a7f925754df3a557e3b1743d21d0c4d

commit r8-10076-gb9bfe25d3a7f925754df3a557e3b1743d21d0c4d
Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 25 13:37:18 2020 -0500

    PR c++/88380 - wrong-code with flexible array and NSDMI.

    Here 'skipped' was set to -1 to force an explicit initializer for 'uninit'
    before the initializer for 'initialized', and so we also tried to emit an
    explicit initializer for the flexible array, for which build_zero_init
    returns error_mark_node.  We should ignore flexarrays even when
    skipped < 0.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    2020-02-25  Jason Merrill  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/88380 - wrong-code with flexible array and NSDMI.
        * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Skip flexarrays.