https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198

--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
What we'd need to do here is capture the temporary equivalence in another
structure, then have lookup_avail_expr do multiple lookups using substitutions
from that alternate structure.  It's not terribly hard conceptually.

We really want to avoid polluting const_and_copies and SSA_NAME_VALUE with
these temporary equivalences when we can't prove one form is clearly better
than the other.  That has caused all kinds of problems.

Reply via email to