https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582 > > --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21) > > The shift_bytes_in_array_{left,right} routines should go next to > > native_{encode,interpret} where maybe also a comment should indicate how to > > combine both? > > Ok. > > > The vn_reference_lookup_3 part looks OK to me, the visit_nary_op one is a > > bit > > gross ... some comments: > > Yes, that part was meant as a hack that we could hopefully throw away for > GCC11. > Anyway, I'll try to finish up the vn_reference_lookup_3 part for big endian, > add testcases and submit that, then perhaps try to do also the pieces stuff > for > non-byte granularity incrementally, and leave the rest for last. Thanks. Guess there's some helpers to factor out - memset() def handling also currently requires byte-offsets (if it's not a clearing memset). It elides the native_encode part but still uses native_interpret for the rest.
