https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> I think what matters is whether the new asm for those is the same or better
> than before. If the tests hardcode particular RA decisions, they'll
> obviously FAIL when something in the RA changes.
The kind of change is from:
mov z2.d, x0
movprfx z0, z1
uabd z0.d, p0/m, z0.d, z2.d
ret
to:
mov z0.d, x0
mov z2.d, z0.d
movprfx z0, z1
uabd z0.d, p0/m, z0.d, z2.d
ret
so this is a genuine regression.
