https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2020-01-28
Component|c++ |middle-end
Known to work| |10.0
Summary|On protobuf generated code, |[9/10 Regression] on
|-Warray-bounds is brittle |protobuf generated code,
|and not very helpful |-Warray-bounds is brittle
| |and not very helpful
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |9.2.0
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed for GCC 9. It does look like it disappeared in GCC 10.0 after
g:6889a3acfeed47265886676c6d43b04ef799fb82 AKA r275981. Thanks for the heads
up!
Let me add the test case and resolve the 10 regression as fixed (r275981 was
checked in to fix a false negative, not specifically suppress a false positive,
but it fixed a bug that apparently worked ways). Since the fix adds new
warnings I don't think the policy allows it to be backported to GCC 9.
