https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs-bisection, wrong-code
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > I'd say this should be fixed in the arm backend, instead of asserts it
> > should check whether operands are aligned and if not, perform unaligned load
> > or store,
> > because the amount of spots in the middle-end that actually just call
> > emit_move_insn when they see a MEM is huge.
>
> Huh, this is a mid-end bug. How can fixing it in the backend be anything
> bug a hack?
>
> There's a contract in place here. If the target defines STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
> the midend must NEVER pass an unaligned object to gen_movsi
Agreed. Did anybody bisect what caused this?
