https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52981
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-12-22
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://bugs.llvm.org/show_
| |bug.cgi?id=22442
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Aaron S. Kurland from comment #1)
> I just realized that my original message was referring to the wrong option.
> I meant: -Wpadded
>
> I am therefore requesting two new options:
>
> -Wpadded-element and -Wpadded-structure
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
Confirmed, I have wanted a split like this as well.
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
>
> [*] (I like David Stone's proposal of -Wpadded-in-middle and
> -Wpadded-at-end, but whoever implements it gets to choose the names)
Those are good name suggestions too.
