https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92983
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The assembler diff between r264593 and r264594, when ignoring offsets etc., is:
- .uleb128 0x27 # (DIE (0x4b6) DW_TAG_lexical_block)
+ .uleb128 0x27 # (DIE (0x4b6) DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine)
.long 0x1ee # DW_AT_abstract_origin
.quad .LBB53 # DW_AT_low_pc
.quad .LBE53-.LBB53 # DW_AT_high_pc
- .long 0x4ef # DW_AT_sibling
- .uleb128 0x1e # (DIE (0x4cf) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
+ .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_call_file (nfs3proc.i)
+ .byte 0x4b # DW_AT_call_line
+ .byte 0xc # DW_AT_call_column
+ .long 0x4f2 # DW_AT_sibling
+ .uleb128 0x1e # (DIE (0x4d2) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
.long 0x1ff # DW_AT_abstract_origin
.long .LLST8 # DW_AT_location
