https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92825
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I'm pretty sure it's just an oversight. If an object, regardless of its type,
lives in registers, then the object need not be considered for
stack-protector-strong.
I think we'll need to clarify a bit at the doc level if you fix this.
