https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Benson from comment #1)
> Running with -fsanitize=thread (suggested by Tobias) gives:

> WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock)
> (pid=9982)
>   Mutex M84 acquired here while holding mutex M26 in thread T63:
>     #2 insert_unit ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c:244 
> 
>   Mutex M26 previously acquired by the same thread here:
>     #2 get_gfc_unit ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c:332 

I think this part is fine:
1. get_gfc_unit: Get global lock ("unit_lock").
2. Call insert_unit: Get lock in u->lock which is for a particular unit number.
3. get_gfc_unit: unlock global lock
(4. u->lock is unlocked at some later point.)

>   Mutex M26 acquired here while holding mutex M84 in thread T63:
>     #2 close_unit_1 ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c:735

close_unit_1:
* Obtain global lock ("unit_lock") – that's line 735
* Unlock the unit-number-specific lock u->lock
* Unlock the global lock.

>   Mutex M84 previously acquired by the same thread here:
>     #2 get_gfc_unit ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c:380 

That's again in get_gfc_unit. Here, I am a bit unsure about the code – but I
have not spend a lot of time on the code:

1. Get global lock (unit_lock)
2. Unit has been found
3. Call the following, i.e. if the outer condition is true,
-> if the lock could not been obtained, unlock 'unit_lock' (to avoid a
deadlock) ? But still return 'p'

  if (p != NULL && (p->child_dtio == 0))
    {
      /* Fast path.  */
      if (! TRYLOCK (&p->lock))
        {
          /* assert (p->closed == 0); */
          UNLOCK (&unit_lock);
          return p;
        }

The TRYLOCK is the one in line 380.

This part looks a bit fishy. Shouldn't this be "if (TRYLOCK (...))"? Without
"!" – or do I miss something crucial?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/kernel-locking/API-mutex-trylock.html

Reply via email to