https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92364
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The warning is correct.
> - Similarly, commenting out unrelated code, makes the warning disappear:
Because jump threading did not happen then.
The code is all undefined anyways due to the uninitilize struct anyways.
When you initilize it to 0, the value 0 is constant prop to the right locations
ad there for you get 0> (1) which is always false.
The warning is for "my_y > (yMax+1)" and my_y is a reference to this->Num_Y and
yMax was a value of this->Num_Y at the begining of the function.
