https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #23) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22) > > (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #21) > > > Since -Wjump-misses-init triggers too often for commonly used C patterns, > > > I do not think it is appropriate to include it in -Wall. > > > > OK, so what about -Wextra then? > > My personal feeling as a user is that clang's warning is useful enough that > if GCC were to implement that, that one could be included in -Wall. It > avoids warning for the common cases where code works as intended, and still > manages to warn for the OP's code. I do not know how much work it would be > to implement that; if it would be too much work, then including > -Wjump-misses-init in -Wextra makes sense to me. Well, since no one's done it yet, I'm guessing it's probably too much work, so... can we just go with the latter?
