https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92143
--- Comment #8 from Daryl Haresign <gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > C11 6.2.8 says "Valid alignments > include only those values returned by an _Alignof expression for fundamental > types, plus an additional implementation-defined set of values, which may be > empty. Every valid alignment shall be a nonnegative integral power of two." > > _Alignof(char) and _Alignof(short) and _Alignof(int) are valid alignments > supported by the implementation, and so aligned_alloc is wrong to reject > them. Read together I agree it does sound that way. (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > Fixed on trunk so far, but I'll backport it too. Great, thanks!
