https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85978
Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi David,
I think that it will be better to add the missing break statements and allow
the nested switches to correctly exit to the end of the function. In that way
the code is clearly only looking for costs that are better than the default
HIGH_COST.
Cheers
Nick
