https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #12) > > but we should really handle this with some non-signaling insns, not punt > > it to libm to do. > > Well we should simply commit Tamar's patch again since it works fine on any > IEEE targets and showed performance gains across many targets. Any issues > with weird 128-bit FP formats can be addressed separately. Do you have a link to those problems? And no, please don't regress us for no reason at all, it's really easy to *not* regress this on double-double.
