https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91549
--- Comment #6 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > This approach is not OK, you should use lp64 effective target instead of > -m64 option. Please see many examples in testsuite/gcc.dg. > > Also, x86 is a multilib target, described as { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* }. Would this one do? diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c index 44d85c04bfb..a5d953b46c7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* s390*-*-* } && lp64 } } } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-vrp2-details" } */ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "gimple_simplified to" 4 "vrp2" } } */