https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91549

--- Comment #6 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> This approach is not OK, you should use lp64 effective target instead of
> -m64 option. Please see many examples in testsuite/gcc.dg.
> 
> Also, x86 is a multilib target, described as { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* }.

Would this one do?

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c
index 44d85c04bfb..a5d953b46c7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* s390*-*-* } && lp64 } } }
*/
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-vrp2-details" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "gimple_simplified to" 4 "vrp2" } } */

Reply via email to