https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87150
Richard Smith <richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
| |.co.uk
--- Comment #22 from Richard Smith <richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk>
---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #19)
> > And now P1155/P1825 removes that text, so in C++20 mode the original
> > testcase needs to call the move constructor again. Marek, I don't see
> > P1825R0 in cxx-status.html, was there a reason not to add it?
>
> No, I followed clang's table but they're missing that one. I'll fix that &
> open a PR for P1825R0.
FYI, it is in Clang's table, but I put it in the C++11 features list since it's
a DR and we're considering it to retroactively apply to C++11's addition of
move semantics.
