https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So UBSAN doesn't work for bitfield enums? Because the issue is certainly
"latent" and I don't see how we can fix it. Which means -fstrict-enums would
be broken as well.
Note that function-code should likely be
union {
enum built_in_function code_normal;
/* enum target_fn */ int code_target;
/* no FE builins */
};
with it now being a full 32bit field using a union is now possible.