https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91242
Bug ID: 91242
Summary: ICE on aarch64 SVE tests -
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_[146].c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I get ICE on these GCC tests:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_4.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/clastb_6.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve (internal compiler
error)
After this checkin:
commit 8482ddd3ae29c2c74f7e01fa0422ee697689e98c
Author: marxin <marxin@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Mon Jun 10 07:04:39 2019 +0000
Fix build with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats.
2019-06-10 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* hash-map.h: Pass default value to hash_table ctor.
* hash-table.h: Add default value to call of a ctor.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@272104
138bc75d-0d04-0410-96
1f-82ee72b054a4
Compiler executable checksum: a0a240676a930bb65e6bc0ad707e5aee
hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values
with a different hash value
during GIMPLE pass: dom
clastb_6.c: In function ‘condition_reduction’:
clastb_6.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at
hash-table.c:137
13 | condition_reduction (TYPE *a, TYPE min_v)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0x604667 hashtab_chk_error()
../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.c:137
0xffbcaf hash_table<poly_int_cst_hasher, false,
xcallocator>::verify(std::pair<tree_node*, poly_int<2u,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_storage> > const*> const&, unsigned int)
../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:1036
0xffbcaf hash_table<poly_int_cst_hasher, false,
xcallocator>::find_slot_with_hash(std::pair<tree_node*, poly_int<2u,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_storage> > const*> const&, unsigned int,
insert_option)
../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:971
0xfdeacf build_poly_int_cst(tree_node*, poly_int<2u,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_ref_storage<false, true> > > const&)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:1681
0xfe3303 force_fit_type(tree_node*, poly_int<2u,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_ref_storage<false, true> > > const&, int, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:1445
0x92b58b int_const_binop(tree_code, tree_node const*, tree_node const*, int)
../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:1196
0x93e28b const_binop
../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:1241
0x94080f const_binop(tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:1719
0x10a7de3 gimple_resimplify2
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-match-head.c:255
0x11d122b gimple_simplify(gimple*, gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node*))
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-match-head.c:930
0x99a14f gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1(gimple*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*),
tree_node* (*)(tree_node*))
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-fold.c:6301
0x104f6d7 vr_values::vrp_visit_assignment_or_call(gimple*, tree_node**,
value_range*)
../../gcc/gcc/vr-values.c:2037
0x148ff0f evrp_range_analyzer::record_ranges_from_stmt(gimple*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c:299
0xeffffb record_temporary_equivalences_from_stmts_at_dest
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c:293
0xf01543 thread_through_normal_block
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c:1064
0xf02f6f thread_across_edge
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c:1372
0xf038bb thread_outgoing_edges(basic_block_def*, gcond*, const_and_copies*,
avail_exprs_stack*, evrp_range_analyzer*, tree_node* (*)(gimple*, gimple*,
avail_exprs_stack*, basic_block_def*))
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c:1463
0xe0bd8b dom_opt_dom_walker::after_dom_children(basic_block_def*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c:1549
0x1463b17 dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*)
../../gcc/gcc/domwalk.c:354
0xe0e7bf execute
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c:724
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
