https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167
--- Comment #2 from mark.eggleston at codethink dot co.uk --- On 15/07/2019 11:24, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91167 > > Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Priority|P3 |P5 > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Last reconfirmed| |2019-07-15 > Blocks| |89078 > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > Severity|normal |enhancement > > --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > As old as gcc 4.4.7. > > Anyway the documentation of -pedantic is wrong (pr35930) and IIRC is not > handled by gfortran. From the code it looks like -pedantic is handled as it is checked in fortran/options,c setting the standards bits accordingly. Warning and errors produced by gfc_notify_std are output based on standards bit mask, most GNU and Legacy warnings are output using gfc_notify_standard. GNU Extension warnings from what I've seen so far are only output if -pedantic is used as an option. > > > Referenced Bugs: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078 > [Bug 89078] [meta-bug] Improve the gfortran manual
