https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #3)
> #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> (v4si) { 0x01020304, 0x05060708, 0x090a0b0c, 0x0d0e0f01 }[i]
> #elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> (v4si) { 0x04030201, 0x08070605, 0x0c0b0a09, 0x100f0e0d }[i]
>
>
> It looks like just a typo in the test case for BE.
>
> 0x0d0e0f01 should be 0x0d0e0f10 based on the LE code.
>
> Tried that and ... it works.
oops - yes. care to commit?
