https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to adrien.hamelin from comment #5) > The noexcept(false) is just to be extra obvious, we see the same behaviour > if we don't mark the function at all. Yes of course. I'm just suggesting that maybe the warning should be changed to take that into account.
