https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70076
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0) > > > The G++ 4.9 Changes document (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html) > > > claims support for C++ VLAs including initializers (as specified in > > > N3639). > > > > I thought that proposal was withdrawn, meaning that VLA support in G++ is > > now only as a GNU extension again, like it was previously? Or am I getting > > it confused with something else? > > No, that's correct. So, if it's only a GNU extension again, that means GCC can just do whatever, right? Is it worth changing behavior here just to match a proposal that's no longer relevant?
