https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to baltic from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
>
> > The libc++ implementation also fails this test:
>
> As i've shown before, neither of those are failures. By the current C++
> standard at least.
It's true that the standard does not require path::iterator to be usable in
generic algorithms that expect forward iterators or bidirectional iterators.
I think the standard is wrong.
> So, long story short: "I am not going to fix the x10 overhead, because I
> believe the standard is wrong."
Yes.
The vector reallocations during path construction are gone for gcc 8.4 (and
also in experimental::filesystem::path in all branches except gcc-7-branch).
