https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90149
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On May 10, 2019 10:34:03 PM GMT+02:00, "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90149 > >Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org > >--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >I'm replacing all the tree codes with %qs and get_tree_code_name >(TREE_CODE >(expr)), like so: > >@@ -3072,13 +3073,15 @@ verify_types_in_gimple_reference (tree expr, >bool >requir >e_lvalue) > size)) > { > error ("mode size of non-integral result does not " >- "match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF"); >+ "match field size of %qs", >+ get_tree_code_name (TREE_CODE (expr))); > return true; > } > if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)) > && !type_has_mode_precision_p (TREE_TYPE (op))) > { >- error ("BIT_FIELD_REF of non-mode-precision operand"); >+ error ("%qs of non-mode-precision operand", >+ get_tree_code_name (TREE_CODE (expr))); > return true; > } > if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)) That looks excessive for code size. Why not just quote the names appropriately?
