https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Line #5 is marked as not executed. I understand that this function might be > optimized as an inline function. However, since Line #7 and Line #8 is > marked as executed and Line #5 is marked as not executed. This might mislead > others when debugging or testing based on code coverage. That's the nature of any optimizing compiler. If you want to have the best results, then don't use -O2, or any other optimization level.
