https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-05-07 9:32 a.m., bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 > > --- Comment #11 from The Written Word <bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot > com> --- > (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #10) >> On 2019-05-07 5:29 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >>> Dave, are you aware of anybody testing ia64-hpux? >>> Should it be deprecated if nobody is maintaining it? >> I don't have or access to a ia64 box. >> >> I don't know the status of Jim Wilson who is listed as ia64 maintainer. >> >> Albert Chin <ch...@thewrittenword.com> is the only person that I know who >> might be actively using it. >> >> My access to the hppa box that I use for hppa-hpux support requires support >> from NRC Canada but >> all colleagues there have retired. It was down for a few weeks until >> yesterday when I got a network person >> to reboot it. >> >> So, maybe it's time to deprecate hpux. I'm still working on hppa-linux. > We are still using it but haven't been able to build anything post 4.9.4. We > tried to find someone to pay to bring this port up-to-date but had no success. > Open to other suggestions but deprecating it might be the only way forward. As I said before, I can't accept US contracts because of HST tax implications. I can only accept Canadian source income. It might help to compile stage1 with -O2 or -Os. This might reduce offset and get a newer version of gcc to build. gcc-8.3.0 seems to have built okay on Debian. gcc-9 so far has failed to build on ia64.
