https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90263
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- My concern is that transforming memccpy to memcpy would leave little incentive for libraries like glibc to provide a more optimal implementation. Would implementing the function simply as memcpy and having the latter return the result of the former be a viable option? Basically, rename memcpy to meccpy, parameterizing it on the termination character in the process, and change memcpy to call memccpy and return the first pointer.
