https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90125

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2019-04-17
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> L(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 46186 [details]
> > gcc9-pr90125.patch
> > 
> > Oops, you're right, thanks for noticing.
> > Here is a full patch including testcases that FAIL without the header patch
> > and succeed with that.  Two tests failed, because the tests rely on actually
> > using fma and at -O0 for the C code fma is not used and so there is a small
> > difference, I've just tweaked constants so that it passes regardless.
> 
> LGTM.

I'll do full bootstrap/regtest on it and post.

Reply via email to