https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #59 from post+gcc at ralfj dot de --- > With the C provenance proposal this example is undefined since 'a' is not exposed (it's address is not converted to an integer). However, from what I can tell, GCC's behavior does not change if we insert '(uintptr_t) &a;' at the beginning of the function. That change should be sufficient to make the example well-defined again.
