https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #71 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #70) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #69) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68) > Does this mean, "when building LLVM on OSX 10.14.2 using GCC as the > bootstrap compiler"? > > (I'm not sure what's wrong here - if the compiler bootstrap succeeds, then > the compiler should be able to process the headers - if the code is C11, > then _Atomic should be accepted, if it's C++ then _Atomic should be mapped > to volatile). I guess that means for some other piece of (C++) code there's some use of _Atomic that's being messed up by including <sys/xxxxx> or some other header that includes ucred.h. ... will try to repeat ...
