https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89909
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think the warning is correct, the first if (0) will never be executed.
- [Bug c/89909] New: false positive for for -Wu... pawel_sikora at zoho dot com
- [Bug c/89909] false positive for for -Wu... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c/89909] false positive for for -Wu... pawel_sikora at zoho dot com
- [Bug c/89909] false positive for for -Ws... egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
