https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89865
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Note, the r264897 change to the testcase was clearly bogus, because then the > testcase is really useless, the intent of the testcase was to check that all > (but the 8) peepholes did the right thing and there are no RMW cycles, with > all the loads and stores from RA (that were previously push/pop instead with > no other %sp changes) that is not tested anymore. I suggest we apply my LEA patch (that is a clear improvement), and recategorize the PR as a RA regression.
