https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89763
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It only breaks code that is already broken, and wouldn't compile with other
compilers anyway.
The standard says that map's iterator type is implementation defined, so it's
wrong to assume it has a operator== member function. All that's guaranteed is
that x==y is a valid expression, not x.operator==(y).
