https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71598
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I see. Do you prefer a langhook solution that would "fix" this only > for C/C++ and LTO then? That sounds like the best approach to me, but I'm no expert here. > OK, I see. VRP still expects it to exist though (just not for > pointer types). Anyhow, I'm probably leaning towards looking at > TYPE_SIZE. Hopefully "incomplete" enums do not exist ;) Yes, sorry, we do call set_min_and_max_values_for_integral_type to set the bounds on them so you're probably running into the dreaded circularity.
