https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89490
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #24) > I think we should also remove the test in default_use_anchors_for_symbol_p, > since: > > sect = SYMBOL_REF_BLOCK (symbol)->sect; > > will surely fault if the block is null. Agree the patch looks good > with those changes. Or add gcc_checking_assert in there as well (again with a comment that get_block_for_section should have not created the block for those sections). > The idea was that the block infrastructure could also be used > at some future time to organise decls into a specific order, > e.g. to promote locality. Obviously that hasn't happened yet, > but I think we should keep the SECTION_SMALL stuff as-is and > only exclude decls that can't be put into blocks for correctness > reasons. Ack.
