https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89305
Bug ID: 89305
Summary: CWG DR 253 is not implemented
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: raphael.kubo.da.costa at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I can see a few bugs marked as SUSPENDED related to DR 253 and how there hadn't
been an official resolution at the time.
According to
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0490r0.html and
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#253 it's part of
C++17 (even though MSVC and clang implement it for older versions as well).
IOW, I believe G++ should accept the following code:
struct S {
};
struct T {
T() {}
const S s_;
};
rather than failing with
const.cc: In constructor ‘T::T()’:
const.cc:5:3: error: uninitialized const member in ‘const struct S’
[-fpermissive]
T() {}
^
const.cc:6:11: note: ‘const S T::s_’ should be initialized
const S s_;
^~
