https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kochise from comment #5)
> That the "standard" never really ruled about bitfield order is already
> baffling and common sense (ie. current implementation) telling to start from
> bit 0 and upward is a good thing.

PowerPC bit-field ordering is different than that too.

Reply via email to